Skip to main content

Compute infrastructure

Where Canada's data centres are, and what they may use

This page maps major buildings and cloud regions that house servers for AI, cloud services, telecom networks, and high-compute workloads. Location matters because these facilities draw electricity, need cooling, and can affect local grid planning.

Facilities mapped87major server buildings and cloud regions
Operators tracked34major public and private infrastructure owners
Provinces covered6city-level coordinates for national scanning
AI or high-compute sites30large cloud, AI, research, and mining facilities

Evidence synthesis

What the deep research says to watch

The useful question is not whether data centres are simply good or bad. The evidence points to a narrower test: what each facility asks of the local grid, water system, public budget, and disclosure record.

Reviewed sources15report-backed references behind this section
Federal intake

The sovereign-compute path is now project-screened

ISED's closed intake targeted large-scale AI data-centre proposals above 100 MW and asked proponents to show Canadian-client benefits, Indigenous participation, environmental impacts, supply-chain fit, readiness, and cost structure.

Which proposed projects move from intake to an MOU, and what public benefits are attached?
Clean power

Low-carbon grids lower operating emissions, not public tradeoffs

Hydro- and nuclear-heavy grids can make operating emissions much lower, but scarce clean electricity still has an opportunity cost for homes, industry, exports, and electrification.

What public value is created in exchange for priority access to clean power?
Water

Water impact is local and design-dependent

Cooling water cannot be read from a national average. Direct cooling, indirect electricity-related water, local basin stress, and drought protocols all change the answer.

What water source, cooling design, and drought rule applies to the specific site?
Climate

Operating emissions are only one layer

A serious assessment separates location-based grid emissions, market-based renewable claims, construction, cooling plant, servers, chips, and replacement cycles.

Is the claim about annual power use, real-time grid impact, or full life-cycle impact?
Benefits

Economic gains are real but narrower than announcements imply

Construction work, tax revenue, and procurement can matter. Permanent operating jobs are usually smaller, and public subsidies need a clear benefit test.

How many permanent jobs, what local procurement, and what enforceable community benefit are attached?
Unknowns

Public reporting is still too thin

Facility-level MW, PUE, WUE, water source, backup generation, hourly load shape, and effective clean-energy matching are often missing from public records.

What is reported by facility, and what remains modelled or unknown?

Policy watch

Canada is moving from attraction to allocation

The clean-grid advantage is real, but the public question is shifting toward who gets scarce firm power, what is disclosed, and what local benefit is enforceable.

Canada
Canada already has a substantial data-centre base, but public facility-level operating data remains uneven.A national count is useful for scale, but local load, cooling, and grid effects still need project-level disclosure.Canada Energy Regulator / Natural Resources Canada
Ontario / Alberta
Ontario and Alberta are now treating AI/data-centre growth as an electricity-allocation and economic-development question.Project timing, location, tariff design, domestic data-hosting value, and grid readiness matter as much as the headline announcement.Independent Electricity System Operator / Government of Ontario / Alberta Electric System Operator / Government of Alberta
B.C. / Quebec / Manitoba
B.C.'s active competitive process puts as much as 400 MW over two years behind a benefits-based screen for AI and data-centre projects; other hydro-rich provinces are also moving toward pricing and uncertainty management.Clean electricity is an advantage, but the page should show it as a public allocation question rather than a free pass.Government of British Columbia / Hydro-Quebec / Manitoba Hydro
Reviewed sources behind the evidence synthesis
Large cloud provider17facilities
Shared data centre49facilities
Telecom network site8facilities
AI / high-compute site13facilities

Largest mapped clusters

The table below is easier to read after the provincial concentration is visible.

ON33
Largest mapped concentration in the public scan layer.
QC23
AB15
BC13
Source: AI Canada Pulse curated data-centre registryCounts use approximate city-level records, not exact street addresses.

Facility role mix

Different sites create different planning questions for power, cooling, connectivity, and sovereignty.

Cloud and high-compute sites30
Large cloud regions, AI/HPC sites, and crypto/HPC facilities.
Shared commercial capacity49
Colocation sites where enterprises rent data-centre capacity.
Telecom network sites8
Network infrastructure that supports connectivity and edge services.
Public-sector sites0
Government-operated infrastructure in the registry.
Source: AI Canada Pulse curated data-centre registryRole groups are derived from the registry type labels.

Registry type counts

The map uses these type labels for filtering and comparison.

Large cloud provider17
Most relevant to AI-scale compute and power planning.
Shared data centre49
Important supporting infrastructure for cloud, telecom, and enterprise services.
Telecom network site8
Important supporting infrastructure for cloud, telecom, and enterprise services.
AI / high-compute site13
Most relevant to AI-scale compute and power planning.
Source: AI Canada Pulse curated data-centre registryThe registry is a scan layer and may lag new or undisclosed facilities.

Operating versus planned electricity range

The planning burden changes when proposed sites are read separately from facilities already operating.

Operating facilities0.37-11.81 TWh/yr

81 operating facilities with estimate ranges.Impact helper model

Planned or proposed facilities0.08-2.32 TWh/yr

6 planned or proposed facilities with estimate ranges.Impact helper model

Source: AI Canada Pulse data-centre impact helperRanges are broad planning estimates, not metered electricity disclosures.

Operating electricity range by province cluster

Province-level estimates combine facility count with the local grid context.

QC
0.13-4.07 TWh/yr

21 operating facilities; grid intensity 1.9 gCO2e/kWh.

ON
0.14-3.96 TWh/yr

33 operating facilities; grid intensity 59 gCO2e/kWh.

BC
0.04-1.83 TWh/yr

13 operating facilities; grid intensity 18 gCO2e/kWh.

AB
0.04-1.48 TWh/yr

11 operating facilities; grid intensity 438 gCO2e/kWh.

NB
0.01-0.42 TWh/yr

2 operating facilities; grid intensity 234 gCO2e/kWh.

Source: AI Canada Pulse data-centre registry and impact helperOnly operating facilities are included in this province rollup.

Operating impact summary

Electricity, emissions, and water ranges should be read as separate planning clues.

  1. E
    0.37-11.81 TWh/yrOperating electricity estimate

    Annual electricity use is estimated from reported capacity where available and broad proxy assumptions elsewhere.

    AI Canada Pulse impact helper
  2. C
    0.03-1.02 Mt CO2e/yrOperating emissions estimate

    Location-based emissions depend heavily on each province electricity grid.

    ECCC grid factors
  3. W
    0.01-4.8 B L/yrDirect cooling water estimate

    Water values are broad because cooling systems and disclosure levels differ by facility.

    LBNL/DOE assumptions
Source: AI Canada Pulse data-centre registry; IEA, ECCC, LBNL/DOE, Statistics Canada assumptionsFacility-level data is uneven, so broad ranges are more honest than single-point estimates.

Comparable scale, where the range is useful

Comparable impacts help readers understand scale, but only when the estimate range is narrow enough to avoid false precision.

  1. kWh
    Too wide for one comparisonHousehold electricity scale

    The estimate range is wider than 10x; a single household count would imply false confidence.

    Statistics Canada, Households and the Environment Survey: Energy use, 2021
  2. CO2
    Too wide for one comparisonPassenger-vehicle scale

    The estimate range is wider than 10x; a single vehicle count would imply false confidence.

    U.S. EPA, typical passenger vehicle emissions
  3. H2O
    Too wide for one comparisonResidential water scale

    The estimate range is wider than 10x; a single water-use count would imply false confidence.

    Statistics Canada, residential water use, 2021
Source: Relatable impact helper sourcesWhen a comparison is too broad, the detailed map panels keep the range visible instead.
Loading map...

Strategy context

Compute commitments need delivery evidence.

The national AI strategy promises sovereign compute, a public supercomputer, and SME access. This map shows infrastructure context; the tracker separates those commitments from proof of delivered capacity.